In the immediate aftermath of the announcement, investigators indicated that they were still seeking information from the public about Nichols’s activities during the period from 1965 to 1978. The tips line — (216) 522-4482 — was published in coverage of the announcement. Whether the public response produced useful information has not been reported.
Phil Nichols, speaking after the announcement, offered the kind of statement that distills fifty-three years of unresolved wondering into a few sentences. He said his father had “left our family in a lurch.” He said he held no animosity and no anger. He said he was at peace.
These statements are worth taking at face value — not because they close the question but because they represent Phil’s own accounting of his relationship to the absence, arrived at over more than half a century, and because they are the most direct testimony available from anyone who had a personal connection to Robert Ivan Nichols.
Phil had a penny and a letter from Napa. He had whatever memories survived from the period before 1964, when his father had been present. He had, now, a name for the man who had left and a confirmed DNA match that established the biological connection beyond doubt.
He did not have a reason. He had peace despite the absence of a reason, which may be the most that the situation allowed.
—
## The Question That DNA Cannot Answer
The identification of Robert Ivan Nichols resolved a forensic question: who was the man who lived and died in Eastlake as Joseph Newton Chandler III? The answer is established, documented, confirmed. But the nature of identification cases like this one is that resolving the forensic question does not necessarily resolve the human one.