What bones could not tell researchers, in most cases, was what a person’s skin looked like, the color of their eyes, the texture of their hair, or the pigmentation of their face. Those traits are soft tissue characteristics controlled by genes, and the genes are not preserved in the physical structure of bone itself. To access the genetic information, you needed the actual DNA — and ancient DNA, degraded by time, moisture, and microbial activity, is extraordinarily difficult to recover.
For most of Cheddar Man’s display life, this meant that the reconstruction accompanying the exhibit was a product of educated guesswork about the general appearance of a type of prehistoric human, filtered through assumptions that were more cultural than scientific. A Manchester University reconstruction produced in 1998 showed a man with lighter skin, brown eyes, and relatively straight, lighter-colored hair. This was a plausible-seeming Caucasian-featured ancient European — a reconstruction that told viewers more about twentieth-century assumptions than about Mesolithic reality.
The assumptions underlying that reconstruction were not arbitrary. Researchers understood, in a broad sense, that modern Europeans tend toward lighter skin and that European populations had been relatively stable in this general characteristic. The assumption was that this characteristic was old — that the pale skin tones common in northwestern Europe today had been the norm for a long time, perhaps since the first anatomically modern humans entered the continent.
This assumption was about to be tested, and revised.
—
## The 1997 Study: A Family Connection
The first DNA work on Cheddar Man came not from a sequencing effort aimed at reconstructing his appearance but from a much simpler question: could living people in the Cheddar area be connected to this ancient individual?