—
## Language, Culture, and What We Cannot Infer from DNA
Genetics is one of the most powerful tools available for studying the prehistoric past, but it has firm boundaries, and some of the most interesting questions about people like Cheddar Man lie entirely outside those boundaries.
Language is perhaps the most significant example. DNA can tell us nothing about what languages ancient people spoke, what grammatical structures those languages had, or how those languages related to the languages spoken today. The question of what language — if that word is even appropriate for the communication systems of Mesolithic hunter-gatherers — was spoken in the caves of Somerset 10,000 years ago is completely unanswerable from any currently available evidence.
This is not merely a gap in the Cheddar Man dataset. It is a fundamental limitation of the available evidence base. Sound does not fossilize. The written word did not exist in Mesolithic Britain — writing was invented millennia later in the Middle East and did not reach Britain until the Roman period. The language spoken by Cheddar Man’s people is gone without trace.
Similarly, DNA cannot tell us about religious beliefs or ritual practices beyond what we can infer from the material culture found with individuals. The skeletal material and artifacts from Gough’s Cave during the relevant Mesolithic occupation period are limited enough that specific ritual or belief claims cannot be made. The elaborate skull-cups and engraved bone found at the site are 14,700 years old — from the earlier Palaeolithic occupation — and their makers are a different population. Cheddar Man’s own relationship to any ritual or mortuary practices is unknown.