The point is exactly the routine. The lunch is metonymy for consistency. For showing up. For the thousand small acts that constitute a present parent. The lunch happens on the day after the bank was robbed and the day after the bankruptcy filing and the day before the chemotherapy appointment and on the ordinary Tuesday when nothing was happening at all. The lunch is what a father is when he is just being a father.
Ashley has said elsewhere that her father was “still my favourite person in the world.” This is not a statement about the moral acceptability of bank theft. It is a statement about the completeness of a relationship—the way that love accumulates across thirty years of ordinary days and does not get erased by a disclosure about what happened thirty years before those days began.
This is the emotional heart of the Conrad case, from the family’s perspective: the question of whether a person can be, simultaneously, someone who did something terrible at twenty and someone who spent the next fifty years being someone worth grieving.
Ashley’s answer is yes. And she has made it her public project to ensure that the version of her father that the world holds includes both—the paper bag and the lunch, the theft and the prom photos, Theodore Conrad and Thomas Randele, connected and inseparable.
—
## The Missing Seventy-Two Hours
One of the genuinely unresolved elements of the Conrad story is the specific quality of those first seventy-two hours after the theft—the period between Friday afternoon, when he walked out of Society National Bank, and Monday morning, when the bank discovered the loss and began calling around to find the missing teller.