And then came 1938.
—
“BOX OFFICE POISON” AND WHAT IT ACTUALLY MEANT
In May 1938, the Hollywood Reporter published an advertisement funded by independent theater owners that listed a group of stars—among them Marlene Dietrich, Katharine Hepburn, Mae West, and Joan Crawford—as “box office poison.” The phrase has clung to Crawford for nearly a century.
What it actually meant, in the context of 1938, was that the independent exhibitors who ran smaller theaters outside the major markets were struggling to sell tickets to these stars’ recent films. It was a commercial complaint from a specific sector of the exhibition industry, not a verdict on talent. But it landed with force, and the studios—which were always more sensitive to box office signals than to anything else—responded by reducing the number and size of productions offered to the named performers.
For Crawford, the “box office poison” moment accelerated a dynamic that was already in motion at MGM. Her relationship with the studio had grown complicated as the decade progressed. She was still a major star, but the era of the flapper—the genre that had made her—was long gone, and the studio’s vision of where to take her next was not always coherent or consistent. She was given roles she found unsuitable and withheld from roles she wanted.
Louis B. Mayer ran MGM during these years, and his relationship with Crawford was the transactional, occasionally warm, ultimately contractual relationship that governed most of the studio system’s human infrastructure. He valued her productivity and her professionalism—by all accounts she was exceptional at learning lines, arriving on time, and doing what was asked. What she wanted was creative agency she did not have and an acknowledgment of her artistic instincts that the studio system was not structured to provide.