The incongruity is worth noting because it illustrates something about Cash’s broad cultural appeal in the late 1960s. He was not easily categorized politically. His sympathy for incarcerated people, his advocacy for prison reform, his recording of albums at Folsom and San Quentin — these were positions associated, in the politics of the period, with the liberal left. His religious convictions, his patriotism, his working-class background, his musical genre — these were associated with the conservative right. Reagan, like many American politicians of that period and since, was comfortable associating with country music as a political-cultural signal without necessarily endorsing all of the content that country music contained.
Cash later navigated this ambiguity explicitly: he recorded “What Is Truth,” a song sympathetic to the counterculture, and also performed at the Nixon White House. He appeared on the cover of Rolling Stone and remained a major figure in Nashville. The breadth of his appeal was genuine, not strategic; he was not performing different identities for different audiences but presenting a consistent self that happened to be legible to people across a wide range of political positions.
—
## The Architecture of a Prison Performance
What made Folsom Prison, specifically, the right place for this recording — rather than San Quentin, Huntsville, or any of the other prisons at which Cash had performed?
Part of the answer is logistical: Folsom responded to Johnston’s inquiry first. San Quentin was his first choice; Folsom was his second. The subsequent San Quentin recording, produced in 1969, confirmed that prison recordings had become a viable and commercially significant format for Cash. If San Quentin had responded first, that album would have come first, and the question of primacy would belong to it.