The age-progression photograph provided additional corroboration, particularly because Carlina noticed its resemblance to her daughter. But the birthmark is the most concrete physical correspondence in available accounts, and it is the detail that most directly connects the specific baby in the photograph to the specific adult who was searching.
—
## Ann Pettway’s Defense and the Question of Diminished Culpability
At Pettway’s sentencing in July 2012, her defense lawyers argued for leniency on the basis of her mental state and personal history. The argument, as is typical in such proceedings, was not that what she had done was acceptable but that her culpability was reduced by circumstances — by the grief of repeated pregnancy losses, by what her lawyers characterized as significant mental illness, by the conditions of her own life that had produced this particular act.
Federal sentencing in the United States considers, among other factors, the history and characteristics of the defendant, the nature and circumstances of the offense, the need to reflect the seriousness of the offense, and the need for deterrence and rehabilitation. Defense advocacy at sentencing tries to make the fullest possible case for mitigation — for circumstances that would lead a judge to sentence at the lower end of the applicable range.
What the defense put forward — Pettway’s miscarriage history, her mental state — should be distinguished from what a court finds. No published account of the sentencing indicates that the court made specific findings about Pettway’s mental health status or that any formal diminished-capacity finding was part of the proceedings. The defense presented mitigation arguments; the court imposed a twelve-year sentence.