But the two-week process between contact and confirmation was not simply bureaucratic delay. It was the verification process working — collecting samples, processing them through a laboratory, interpreting the results. In a case involving criminal charges and family reunification, that verification process was essential to ensuring that the right person was identified and the right person was arrested.
—
## The Role of Federal Jurisdiction in Prosecuting Cold Cases
The federal kidnapping charges against Annugetta Pettway illustrate a specific feature of the American criminal justice system that has significant consequences for cases that remain unresolved for many years: the existence of federal statutes with no statute of limitations for certain serious offenses.
State criminal statutes of limitations exist partly to protect defendants from prosecution for alleged crimes that occurred so long ago that witnesses’ memories have faded and evidence has been lost — the theory being that time-limited prosecution is fairer to people accused of old crimes. But those limitations also mean that serious crimes that go undetected or unprosecuted for long enough may eventually become immune from state prosecution.
Federal criminal law takes a different approach to certain serious crimes, particularly those involving children and interstate elements. Federal kidnapping under 18 U.S.C. § 1201 carries no statute of limitations when the victim was under eighteen at the time of the offense and was not killed. The legislative rationale is that the category of harm — stealing a child and concealing the crime — is sufficiently serious, and the combination of the child’s age and survival sufficiently specific, to justify unlimited prosecution time.