—
## Why This Case Persists
Thirty-six years of failure to recover thirteen stolen objects from a major American institution is a record that raises questions about the investigative systems that have been applied to the problem.
Some of those questions have been answered, at least partially. Early investigative resources were insufficient. The initial FBI assignment of a single agent to a case of this magnitude was, by later accounts, a mistake that slowed the gathering of leads in the crucial early period. The release of surveillance footage from a different night caused years of misdirected attention. Several of the people best positioned to provide information—Donati, Reissfelder, DiMuzio, Merlino, Guarente—died before they could be effectively questioned, or died before investigators had assembled enough evidence to compel their cooperation.
Some questions remain open. The Philadelphia connection has never been publicly resolved. The specific mechanism by which the art moved from the original thieves through the criminal network has never been fully documented. The current location—whether the works are together or separated, in the United States or abroad, in conditions that preserve them or conditions that are destroying them—is unknown.
The case has attracted sustained attention from journalists, documentary filmmakers, podcasters, and amateur investigators. The WBUR podcast *Last Seen*, a detailed investigative audio series, compiled a remarkable amount of documented information about the theft and the investigation. Geoffrey Kelly’s book added the FBI’s internal perspective in a level of detail that was previously unavailable. The case generates coverage on each anniversary, each significant development, each new book or film that examines it.