—
## The Lord Who Lost Faith
Among the figures in Hauser’s story, the 4th Earl of Stanhope stands out as the most complicated.
Philip Henry Stanhope was a British aristocrat with a keen interest in unusual cases. He encountered the Kaspar Hauser story and was captivated by it. He began visiting Hauser, spent significant personal funds investigating his origins, and eventually took legal custody of him in 1831. He arranged for Hauser to be taken on trips to Hungary, where, according to the Baden prince theory’s supporters, Hauser’s true family might have had connections. He promised to take Hauser to England.
None of it worked. The Hungary trips produced nothing. Hauser did not display the signs of recognition that proponents of the royal theory expected. Stanhope grew increasingly skeptical, finding Hauser’s stories inconsistent and his behavior not entirely consistent with what a genuine foundling of exceptional origin would display.
By January 1832, Stanhope left Hauser in the care of a schoolmaster in Ansbach, continuing to pay his expenses but abandoning the plan to bring him to England. The relationship had soured. After Hauser’s death in December 1833, Stanhope published a book titled *Tracts Relating to Caspar Hauser* in which he presented the evidence against Hauser’s story and argued that he had been deceived. Stanhope became, posthumously, one of the principal sources for the view that Hauser was a fraud.
The question of Stanhope’s motives has been raised by those who believe in the prince theory. Some suggested that Stanhope had connections to the Baden royal family and might have had reasons, beyond personal disillusionment, to discredit Hauser. This interpretation is speculative and is not supported by documentary evidence in sources available for this article. What is documented is Stanhope’s progression from enthusiastic patron to published skeptic, and the specific observations that drove the change.